Letter: The taxman triumphant
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Ian Barlow
Sir: Richard Jones and his staff at the Large Groups office of the Inland Revenue should be congratulated for improving the Revenue's appreciation of the way business operates ("The taxman with his sights on a clear picture," 18 December), but his "customers" should be under no illusions of the implications of this progress.
The key is in Mr Jones' phrase "better awareness of what they (ie businesses) are doing". The one-stop shop approach of the Large Groups Office, where tax matters previously handled by up to 20 separate offices are gathered under one roof, allows more vigorous examination of large companies' tax affairs. This country's legislature offers little protection to companies whose affairs come under close scruntiny by the Revenue - examinations which can encompass transactions going back five, 10 or 20 years.
Corporates can therefore expect to negotiate in an increasingly fierce environment as the Revenue increases its expertise. There are two issues arising. First, UK plc needs to ensure its tax affairs are watertight. Second, there is as yet no retrospective time limit on the Revenue's powers to examine a company's transactions - generally a limit of three years from the date a tax return is filed is in place in the US, for example.
Increased understanding on both sides deserves encouragement; however, recent developments, and the wide-ranging powers currently enjoyed by the Revenue, lead me to suspect the odds may be moving inexorably in its favour.
Yours faithfully,
Ian Barlow
UK Head of Tax
KPMG
18 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments