Letter: The Social Chapter and the rule of law
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The Government's new legal advice on amendment 27 to the Maastricht Bill should not be allowed artificially to foreclose parliamentary discussion of the desirability of signing the Social Chapter. With ingenuity, there must be a way of compelling the Government to bow to the will of Parliament.
Suppose that the coming into force of the legislation were made conditional upon the UK signing the Social Chapter? All that would be required would be an amendment to the commencement clause of the Bill to delay its implementation until that event. A commencement clause of this kind would be novel certainly, but I doubt if even the law officers would advise it to be ineffective. Perhaps some obliging backbencher will test the water?
Yours faithfully,
IAN LEIGH
Newcastle Law School
The University
Newcastle upon Tyne
16 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments