Letter: The rumble of wind turbines

Alan Lewis
Saturday 02 April 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MALCOLM SMITH'S 'Tilting at wind turbines' (Review, 27 March) was marred by two errors, one explicit the other implied. First, it is not true that '35-45 decibels . . . is twice as high as the background level of 19 decibels typical of a still night in the countryside'.

Each 3 decibel increase constitutes a doubling of sound power, so that an increase from 19 to, say 40 decibels (a rise of 21 or 7 x 3 decibels) represents seven doublings. This amounts not to a twofold but a 128-fold increase in sound output.

Second, the reference in the penultimate paragraph to conventional power stations operating 'at little more than a third of peak efficiency', with its clear implication that the stations could (by getting their act together perhaps?) operate much more efficiently, is not fair.

The concept of 100 per cent thermal efficiency, while useful in thermodynamic theory, is not remotely approachable in the real world where wholly intractable and quite fundamental practical constraints impose limits on thermal efficiency which exceed those actually attained in power station practice by very little.

Alan Lewis

Thornbury, Bristol

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in