Letter: The Royal Family is not to blame
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE heart of the matter in Neal Ascherson's 'Mockery of monarchy tilts the power axis' (17 January) is the observation that the British state is starting to break down. He is right to say that it is not the fault of the Royal Family or the fault of the monarchy as an institution.
It is, as he implies, the 'efficient' part of the constitution that has broken down and its theories and myths can no longer sustain it. Consider the introduction of the poll tax. There is believed to have been no Civil Service advice in favour of it; no local authority was in favour of it; a large minority, if not a majority, of the Cabinet was against it. The majorities in the House of Commons grossly overstated the real support it had among MPs and a majority of working peers were against it. Yet it passed into law, was implemented at great cost, and now has had to be replaced, again at great cost.
The Cabinet is no longer a restraining force on a determined prime minister and the House of Commons has long since ceased being an effective restraint on a government with a working majority. The informal checks and balances on executive power (local government, universities, etc) have also been reduced almost to nothing in the past decade, and the press (even the Independent) is much less critical than it should be. The frivolity of much press comment and language seems to be an acknowledgement of impotence. The Government feels it can attack the press so ferociously because of the absence of serious and sustained criticism of the constitutional abuses of the past decade.
Graham Bindon
Mochdre, Powys
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments