Letter: The role of Urban Development Corporations
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your article on Urban Development Corporations ('Development losses of pounds 67m 'a scandal' ', 13 July) contains two gross inaccuracies. Urban Development Corporations represent an excellent way of assembling, clearing and ensuring the use of large tracts of derelict and vacant land that disfigure the centres of our great conurbations. They offer the opportunity for low-cost housing for sale, commercial and industrial development, and improved shopping and leisure facilities at the core of our cities. You have no basis whatsoever for alleging that I dislike or am hostile to them. On the contrary, I have often spoken and written about their virtues.
Your numbers about the alleged losses on land holdings are equally fallacious. The Labour Party has misunderstood answers to questions it has posed. It is not possible to compare the acquisition cost of all land bought by the UDCs with the current value in the books. Land is held in the UDCs' accounts on the normal prudent basis required to produce a true and fair view; that is to say, at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
On this basis, it would be impossible for the UDCs ever to show gains before disposal on their land-holdings. Yet history shows that many of them have made substantial gains on holdings when they have come to sell them at market prices. In addition, land acquired includes land acquired for public purposes and for the construction of roads and other necessary access facilities. Such land may well be valued at zero, but it is essential to create the conditions for enterprise and investment in an area.
Finally, even on the basis of the figures that you and the Labour Party are misusing, the figures for all 10 English UDCs, combining realised gains to date and book values, show an overall gain of pounds 173m rather than a loss of pounds 67m.
Yours sincerely,
JOHN REDWOOD
Minister for Local Government and Inner Cities
Department of the Environment
London, SW1
15 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments