Letter: The right way to train new teachers to educate the young

Mr Guy Jenkins
Friday 11 June 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The hostile reaction (report, 10 June) from a teachers' union towards John Patten's proposals for primary teacher training reform was predictably conservative and patronising. Its argument that at least three years' training is needed to ensure the academic, emotional and social stability of seven-year-olds in the classroom might be more convincing if that argument were consistent with current practice in teacher recruitment.

A postgraduate certificate in education qualifies a student to teach at secondary level. The course is for one year. We are, therefore, expected to accept that a graduate, for some unknown reason, can competently become a teacher after such a course, but when applied to non-graduates it is 'selling the profession cheap'.

While understanding that the position of the teaching unions is rooted in their desire to protect vested interest, it is initially difficult to rationalise why the Labour Party has also come out against the proposals. An opportunity is being offered to those people whose range of personal, academic and business experience and skills could broaden and enrich school life; people who perhaps have been unable to follow, through circumstances readily identified and empathised with by Labour support, the established route to the teaching profession.

Far from championing these people, far from supporting and encouraging a truly broad base of educators, the Labour Party is playing safe with the votes of teachers.

Yours faithfully,

GUY JENKINS

Torquay, Devon

11 June

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in