Letter: The real dangers on motorways
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: 'Undertaking' on motorways could be beneficial for the environment by releasing more road space. It is not the undertaking that will cause danger, but the existing overtaking, and the difference in vehicle speeds caused by the associated, often flagrant, yet socially acceptable, speeding on British motorways. Pile-ups happen in the fast lane.
In the United States, where one can pass in any lane, virtually all traffic rigorously obeys the speed limits, and will travel precisely at these speeds, maintaining them for hours on end. Because of this mature attitude to driving, one is seldom overtaken - or undertaken - as vehicles merge between lanes only as they need to make a lane change for exiting or some other purpose. With all lanes travelling at the same speed, all are all fully utilised, allowing more traffic on the road.
In the UK, the right-hand lane is commandeered by small numbers of businessmen in speeding BMWs. If undertaking were allowed, combined with a rigorous imposition of the speed limit that is essential for its safe working, existing motorway capacity would be increased. This would avoid much of the rationale for the Government's continuing environmentally-disastrous road-building programme, while reducing CO2 emissions and making for more relaxed and safer driving.
Yours faithfully,
THEO HOPKINS
London, W14
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments