LETTER:The prisons policy, the judge and his verdicts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Paul Cavadino
Sir: Polly Toynbee clearly demonstrates the fallacy of the Home Secretary's argument that "Prison works" ("Listen, minister, prison doesn't work", 31 May). There is, however, mounting evidence that certain forms of supervision in the community do work strikingly well in cutting reoffending.
A growing body of research shows that such supervision programmes can reduce reconviction rates by between 20 and 50 per rent. These include approaches that confront offending behaviour and attitudes, teach offenders to restrain aggression and impulsive behaviour, and provide them with skills training leading to employment. When carried out in prison, similar prograrnmes can help to reduce reoffending on release; but the evidence shows that such work is most effective in the community.
The excessive use of prison has three results. First, it means the unnecessary imprisonment of some offenders who could have been dealt with more effectively by community supervision. Secondly, by overcrowding prisons it reduces their ability to provide constructive regimes that could help to reduce recidivism. Thirdly, because prison is so expensive, it consumes resources that should be used to develop effective community supervision programmes. In short, the misguided "Prison works" policy reduces the likelihood that custodial and non-custodial penalties will fulfil their potential to reduce reoffending.
Yours faithfully,
PAUL CAVADINO
Chair
Penal Affairs Consortium
London, SW9
31 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments