Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Sir: Angus Stirling and D. C. Eastwood (Letters, 9 and 13 October) have dealt more than adequately with your leading article 'Hooked on stately homes' (8 October). As you say, nostalgia makes a poor guide, but so does ignorance and muddle-headedness. Preserving the heritage for the benefit of the nation and future generations is a different issue from 'subsidising the present owners'.
There are three approaches to conservation. The first is to leave it to market forces, which you propose. This, supplemented from time to time by major rescue packages, has been the policy of successive governments, which have left the private owner to bear the high cost of maintenance from his own pocket while taxing him as though he were running a profitable business. As a result, 450 historic properties have been sold over the past 20 years. Less than a quarter have been bought by new owners dedicated to preserving them. A few have been successfully converted to flats. The balance were converted for commercial use in the affluent Eighties (and are again in trouble in the austere Nineties) or have been back on the market one or more times in search of a buyer who can afford to look after them. During the past 12 years more than pounds 196m of chattels have been sold from private collections, more often than not to pay for maintenance and repairs.
For some houses the National Trust offers the right solution, but invoking the trust is not a magic formula. Like the private owner, the trust needs funds to preserve and run its properties.
The third solution is to allow owners to settle their own assets into 'tax-free' maintenance funds irrevocably dedicated to the maintenance and repair of the heritage property, subject to reasonable public access.
At present, maintenance funds attract the full rate of income tax and capital gains tax. From what is left there is also VAT to pay at 17.5 per cent on maintenance and repairs. Relieving the tax burden would free more resources for conservation.
Allowing private owners to endow their own properties for the benefit of the nation rather than the occupants is surely a reasonable proposal.
Yours sincerely,
SHELBURNE
President
Historic Houses Association
London, SW1
21 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments