Letter: The positive alternatives to negative income tax welfare schemes
Your support helps us to tell the story
My recent work focusing on Latino voters in Arizona has shown me how crucial independent journalism is in giving voice to underrepresented communities.
Your support is what allows us to tell these stories, bringing attention to the issues that are often overlooked. Without your contributions, these voices might not be heard.
Every dollar you give helps us continue to shine a light on these critical issues in the run up to the election and beyond
Eric Garcia
Washington Bureau Chief
Sir: You, like others, have found that universal benefits are easier to attack than to identify. In particular, child benefit is universal but not a universal benefit. It is also a commuted version of the old child tax allowance. It is the only recognition in our taxation system of the considerable costs of bringing up children, and if it were replaced it would have to be replaced by a child tax allowance that would be much worse targeted.
On the other hand, you are right about the savage marginal rates of tax affecting those who come off benefit systems as a solution to this problem. This is Liberal Democrat policy, and we welcome your support for it.
Yours sincerely,
RUSSELL
House of Lords
London, SW1
10 February
The writer is Liberal Democrat spokesman on social security in the Lords.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments