Letter: The positive alternatives to negative income tax welfare schemes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: You, like others, have found that universal benefits are easier to attack than to identify. In particular, child benefit is universal but not a universal benefit. It is also a commuted version of the old child tax allowance. It is the only recognition in our taxation system of the considerable costs of bringing up children, and if it were replaced it would have to be replaced by a child tax allowance that would be much worse targeted.
On the other hand, you are right about the savage marginal rates of tax affecting those who come off benefit systems as a solution to this problem. This is Liberal Democrat policy, and we welcome your support for it.
Yours sincerely,
RUSSELL
House of Lords
London, SW1
10 February
The writer is Liberal Democrat spokesman on social security in the Lords.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments