Letter: The MPs' oath
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I take issue with your leader "Not fit to sit in Parliament? It is the oath that is not fit" (5 December). In taking an oath of allegiance to the Queen a Member of Parliament makes no statement about his views on the monarchy. He recognises a fact: the Queen is the head of state of the nation in whose governance he has been elected to take a part.
His intentions may well be to change that system, but by choosing the route of democracy he has chosen to recognise the current state of the system as a starting point.
It is spurious to make comparisons with amendments permitting those who do not believe in God to affirm their allegiance rather than to use the name of a deity in whose existence they do not believe: the Queen is head of state; belief in the Christian or any other god is a matter of opinion.
MEGAN C ROBERTSON
Crewe, Cheshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments