Letter: The morality of military intervention in Bosnia
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Rebecca Tinsley (letter, 3 August) bases her arguments on the false, but widespread, assumption that there must be such a thing as a 'nation' in Bosnia. She also fails to appreciate that the 'aggressor' she refers to is no less 'Bosnian' than the rest of the population in the former Yugoslav republic.
Like many who voice their views on the topic, Ms Tinsley seems ignorant of the fact that one-third of 'Bosnians' (an undefined ethnic category within Yugoslavia) are Serbs and a further fifth Croats. It is difficult to see why these two ethnic groups should provide their loyalties to a Muslim-led geographical region, when they have real nations to turn to on their doorsteps.
What many had warned about has turned into a reality - multi- ethnic Bosnia needs multi-ethnic Yugoslavia to survive. Only within the federation did the three main ethnic groups have their cultural and ethnic centres (Belgrade and Zagreb for Serbs and Croats, respectively) within the same state. An 'independent' Bosnia can now manifestly survive only as an internationally policed protectorate, hardly a desirable prospect for her sponsors to contemplate.
Instead of castigating the Foreign Office for not helping 'Bosnians' defend themselves against the 'aggression' of other 'Bosnians', Ms Tinsley might reflect upon the unstated assumption of EC and US foreign policy, supported by much of the British media - namely that it must be desirable and natural to transform 'quickly and peaceably' one state (Yugoslavia) into four, five, or maybe six 'independent' mini-
statelets with as many Mickey Mouse currencies and economics to match. The past 200 years of history anywhere in the world, including, of course, 70-odd years following the creation of an additional state on the British Isles, points to the utterly unrealistic and incredibly facile nature of such a policy.
Yours faithfully,
M. GAVRILOVIC
Serbian Information Centre
London, W11
3 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments