Letter: The means test and the modernisation of benefits
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Polly Toynbee argues in favour of a means test for state pensioners. May I remind her that the contributions paid for these pensions to the Treasury are not a tax, but a premium for an annuity. It would amount to a fraud to take from the better-off to pay more to the poorer, as to transfer funds in any other pension scheme.
It is bad enough that the age allowance is means-tested, the only allowance that is. What tips the balance of being able to claim this allowance or not is usually the interest from the nest egg the pensioner has accumulated during a lifetime of savings and doing without what other people enjoy, in order to stay independent when old and decrepit and not to be a burden on the community.
Yours faithfully,
E. SIMPSON
Fleet,
Hampshire
18 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments