Letter: The means test and the modernisation of benefits
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Polly Toynbee argues that welfare benefits such as state pensions and child benefit should be cut back because they go to the rich as well as to the poor. This argument misses the point. The object of the welfare state is to bind society together in a common system of services and benefits, not just to relieve the worst misery and leave the better-off free to walk by on the other side of the street.
If we want to be sure the welfare state concentrates help on the poor, we should make sure the rich pay higher taxes to finance benefits for all.
Yours sincerely,
PETER TAYLOR-GOOBY
Professor of Social Policy
University of Kent
Canterbury, Kent
18 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments