Letter: The language of ordinary folk
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Does the political career of Ross Perot signal the return to a vernacular style in modern politics? The discomfort he causes to mainstream politicians is a feature of the style in which he thinks and speaks, of attitudes expressed forcefully in his own idiom.
He uses a political language that his audiences fully comprehend, whether or not they agree with his views. This way of talking politics is not exempt from cliche, dogma and confusion; but it can transform the North American Free Trade Area proposal (2,000 pages of legalese) into a question that attracts public interest. Perot's approach belongs to an older American tradition and he is the only one exploiting it.
Recently we have seen the modern 'autocue' device being scorned by Labour's idiomatic John Prescott (with applause from Sir Robin Day). Apart from Mr Prescott, is there a contemporary frontline politician who knows how to use an authentic colloquial style to develop political ideas?
Set against this, we see the disowning of individual traits for reasons of television; and the rewarding of the vacuous. Mr Prescott himself was previously 'marginalised' by his party's image-makers for plain speaking.
Could the rising fortunes of this rehabilitated figure lead to the rejection of his party's modern jargon, a return to ideas that matter, and a common-language approach? I hope so, but I somehow doubt it.
Yours faithfully,
PHIL TURNER
London, SW2
15 November
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments