Letter: The lady didn't want an heir
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MALCOLM RIFKIND writes "I was always puzzled by her (Thatcher's) early enthusiasm for him (Major)" and "He was her own choice as her preferred successor" ("Major has every right to shop Lady Thatcher", 15 August). Really?
Thatcher never for one moment seriously considered handing over to anyone. Would we not go on and on? It was entirely consistent with this for her to allow it to be thought that the weak and malleable John Major was her heir apparent and so in effect have no heir apparent.
It took the near-universal recognition that she was barking to render her fallible. No one won the resulting leadership contest: she had already lost it. Major, minus his wisdom tooth, was awarded the prize for causing least offence to most Tory MPs and won the following general election for not being Thatcher. He then lost the next one for being himself and for the Tories being Tory.
EDDIE DOUGALL
Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments