Letter: The grid should go underground

Mr David Ross
Wednesday 19 July 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr David Ross

Sir: George Barker (Letters, 17 July) complains of interruptions to power supplies caused by normal bad weather. The main culprit is usually the grid, which insists on distributing high-voltage electricity along overhead power lines, supported by columns of ugly pylons across the countryside.

The solution is to put the cables underground to make them safe from the weather, but the greedy grid complains that this costs more, and it prefers to distribute its vast wealth to its directors. It has 7,000km of overhead lines but only 600km of cable.

The Countryside Commission has appealed to Offer, the Office of Electricity Regulation, to take action against the grid and against the Regional Electricity Companies, who are responsible for the low-voltage network, but without result. Offer has concentrated on cost above all else and appears to have forgotten that the Electricity Act of 1989 requires it to take into account "the effects on the physical environment of activities connected with the generation, transmission or supply of electricity".

The right approach would be for Offer to insist that the grid and the RECs adopt a policy of progressive undergrounding until all their cables are below ground and the countryside has been returned to the state in which they found it.

Yours truly,

David Ross

London, SE5

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in