Letter: The evidence is that home can be a safe place to give birth
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HELEN EMBLEY (Letters, 15 August) described her two complication-free pregnancies, both of which ended with difficulties at delivery. While it is wrong to advocate home birth on the basis of individual experiences, it is equally wrong to encourage all women into hospital on the basis of individual clinical outcomes. Decisions must rest on available research, which at present indicates that there is no scientific reason why some women should not safely choose to have their babies at home.
We also know that when women have their babies away from the consultant unit, about 14 per cent transfer to hospital. Because of the skills of midwives or doctors, impending complications are invariably picked up early and the transfer is unhurried.
The report Changing Childbirth was not about home birth, but about women making informed choices.
Rosemary Jenkins
Royal College of Midwives Trust
London W1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments