Letter: The debate over Maastricht

Mr Charles Lawrie
Monday 07 September 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Now that sufficient dissatisfaction with the Maastricht form of European union is emerging, might it not be a time to hold a forum concerning the future of a more united Europe with all parties concerned?

The Council of Europe would be the obvious forum for this debate, and by promoting such a development would fulfil the aim of its founders, and of those such as Vaclav Havel, who told the Conference on European Confederation (Prague, June 12-16, 1991): 'The Council of Europe could at the same time become the political, legislative and (so to speak) philosophical centre of the confederating Europe.'

Yours sincerely,

CHARLES LAWRIE

Porthmadog, Gwynedd

5 September

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in