Letter: The dangers of stereotyping
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I would not doubt the positive intentions of Andy Beckett's article "Cruel world of the paedophiles" (5 May), but I was dismayed to find old stereo-types replaced with new ones. Dr Art O'Connor's segregation of abusers into "incest offenders", "standard paedophiles" and"young offenders" is likely to distort the social work and criminal justice response to individuals already highly proficient at escaping detection and prosecution.
Research is far from conclusive, but the tendency in the 1970s to differentiate between incest offenders and "paedophiles" has been repeatedly refuted by recent studies. For instance, Abel et al's study in 1988 indicated that 49 per cent of incestuous fathers were simultaneously abusing outside the home, while studies of arousal patterns have suggested little difference between men who have been convicted of sexual offences inside or outside the family. Similarly, the separation of young offenders into a distinct group overlooks indications that the vast majority of abusers begin to sexually offend in adolescence.
The incest offender image suggests that sexual offenders who admit to offending within the family are not a risk outside it. The implicit distinction remains between the "lapsed" family man whose experiences can somehow be more readily accepted than the untreatable "deviant".
It is understandable that workers are drawn to classification when engaged in stressful work provoking strong emotions. But if this work is to prioritise the protection of victims we must be alert to the sophisticated manner that perpetrators target children, and ensure that distinctions remain fluid rather than absolute.
Robin Tuddenham
London N17
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments