Letter: The curriculum, as seen from the top

Sir Ron Dearing
Thursday 22 April 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The article 'Uneducated, but no empty head' (22 April) gave useful insights into my approach to the task of reviewing the national curriculum and to simplifying testing.

Unfortunately, there are two substantial misinterpretations in the summary on the front page, 'Tests chief promises to listen to teachers'. I am aware of the strong view that the curriculum is overloaded and I am looking forward to talking to teachers about proposals to give them more room to make their own curriculum decisions and ensure the national curriculum does not take up all their time. I have not, however, come to the view that the content of each of the 10 national curriculum subjects should be reduced. That is something I must consider in the light of forthcoming consultations.

Your feature notes my acknowledgement that some areas of the curriculum, such as English literature, might be better assessed through coursework than through formal tests. I would not like readers to conclude that I thought the existing tests are simplistic. Nor would I wish them to think, as reported on page 1, that I believe English as a whole should be tested solely though continuous assessment.

Yours sincerely,

RON DEARING

Chairman

National Curriculum Council

York

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in