Letter: The choice is wind power or selfishness
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Duff Hart-Davis (article, 28 December) purports environmental interests. Yet he fails to appreciate the seriousness of environmental damage from fossil fuels and the way clean technology, such as wind power, has profound environmental benefits. His condemnation of the wind turbine at Nympsfield near Stroud is typical of the closed minds and selfish interests of deck-chair environmentalists.
Closed minds, because action is required to abate damaging chemical emissions from fossil fuel power stations and transport. Hart-Davis must state how he wants electricity to be produced for his own electric kettle. Is he willing to be jointly responsible for excessive carbon dioxide triggering ecological damage from changing weather and rising sea water? Is he happy that his kettle is responsible for acid rain damage to forests and rivers? Does he want expensive and risk-ridden nuclear-generated electricity?
Selfish interests, because he wishes his own view of visual scenery to dominate over all other considerations. He can be assured that no species of animal or plant shares his concern; visual impact is a solely human criterion. Healthy ecology, clean air and water, and maintenance of soil, are the major concerns. A quiet wind turbine, as at Nympsfield, is ecologically benign; sterilising only the 25 square metres of its base, it has no additional adverse effect on animals or plants (bird strikes are minimal; less than from a road vehicle). One such turbine will produce essential electricity for the local grid equal to the amount used annually by about 500 houses now, and about 1,000 future houses with energy efficiency.
Moreover, there are many people who see wind turbines as beautiful dynamic structures; examples of modern technology for sustainable development. I wish I could see one from my house.
Professor JOHN TWIDELL
Institute of Energy and Sustainable Development
De Montfort University
Leicester
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments