Letter: The capital's healthcare needs

Dr Chaand Nagpaul
Tuesday 11 April 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Philip Hunt's letter (8 April) supporting Mrs Bottomley's proposals for London's hospitals displays the persuasive rhetoric prevalent in today's NHS-speak, concealing the serious crisis experienced by London's doctors and patients alike. London currently faces record waiting lists (165,000), matched by ever-increasing difficulty in emergency admissions due to bed shortages. Inner London's GPs and community services are at present under- resourced to serve current needs, let alone the increased workload after hospital closures.

Additionally, the Tomlinson Report's statistics underpinning the Government proposals for London have been widely discredited. Professor Brian Jarman has refuted the questionable data suggesting that London is overbedded, demonstrating that London has no more beds than the national average, but actually fewer than other urban cities, despite the unique and increased needs of the capital. The stipulation that London is disproportionately resourced at the expense of the rest of the country is equally invalid, with current figures showing that London is actually funded less per capita than the national average.

Even the Kings Fund, the independent healthcare think-tank which originally inspired the Government's proposals for London's health services, has called for a moratorium on any hospital and bed closures in London for at least five years. Of course change is both inescapable and necessary. But it needs to take place over a timescale worthy of the complexity of the capital after an informed debate with a consensus view.

Yours faithfully,

CHAAND NAGPAUL

Honeypot Medical Centre

Stanmore,

Middlesex

10 April

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in