Letter: The best way to vote
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Donald Macintyre suggests (Comment, 8 May) that the Alternative Vote (AV) offers a middle course on electoral reform which should be supported by Liberal Democrats.
AV does not provide for proportionality. As Donald Macintyre says, in 1997 AV would have produced an even less proportional result than first- past-the-post. A two-stage approach to electoral reform with AV being introduced for the next election and top-up lists being added after boundary changes is also suggested (AV-plus). This is likely to be more costly than a one-step reform and may lead to an increased number of MPs if proportionality is to be achieved. More MPs would be both unpopular and unjustified.
Liberal Democrats favour the single transferable vote (STV) as the system best able to meet the terms of reference of the Jenkins Commission. STV could be introduced at the next election without a lengthy Boundary Commission review by simply aggregating existing seats based on natural communities such as cities. STV maximises voter choice, allows preferential voting and could maintain the constituency link by the use of multi-member natural constituencies.
AV is not a proportional system, and does not therefore meet the remit of the Jenkins Commission. AV-plus may be more proportional than AV, but there is a system that better meets the remit of the Commission in STV.
ROBERT MACLENNAN MP
(Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross, Lib Dem)
House of Commons
London SW1
The writer is Liberal Democrat Constitutional Affairs Spokesman
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments