Letter: The abolition of wages councils will not help anyone

Earl Russell
Friday 27 August 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: My congratulations to Barrie Clement on his article on the abolition of wages councils ('Farewell to the workers' friend', 26 August). He is probably right that the harmful consequences will not much worry the Government, but he has left out the only one that will. The measure will produce a large increase in the social security budget, just when Peter Lilley, Secretary of State for Social Security, has been instructed to reduce it.

As people's wages fall further below benefit levels, so the bill for family credit and housing benefit will rise. It is foolish to allow benefits to those in work without having some check on low wages. Otherwise, bad employers, and, if they are to compete, good ones, too, are under too much temptation to pass on an increasing proportion of their wages bill to the state. This conclusion is based on experience, for the system has been tried before, and is known to history as the Speenhamland system. As a result:

The little inn at Speenhamland, that lies beneath the hill

Is rightly called the Pelican - from its enormous bill.

Until I watched this government in action, I had not realised how true it is that those who do not know history are condemned to repeat it.

Yours sincerely,

RUSSELL

House of Lords

London, SW1

26 August

The writer is Liberal Democrat spokesman in the House of Lords on social security.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in