Letter: That Thursday feeling
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Professor MacDonald Jackson (Letters, 27 July) may well be correct in his conclusion that there is no significant evidence to suggest that Thursday is the wettest day of the week, but unfortunately his statistical analysis based on a chi-squared test is totally invalid. As correctly noted by Alan Farr (Letters, 28 July), the chi-squared test is applicable only to frequency counts, not to measurement data. If Professor Jackson wishes to use a chi-squared test then he would need to collect rainfall data over a long period of time and construct a frequency distribution (over days) showing the number of weeks for which each day turned out to be the wettest. He could then test this distribution for departures from uniformity over the seven days.
Mr Farr's suggestion of using a t- test is, I am afraid, equally invalid, unless there is some meteorological reason for believing, a priori, that Thursdays have a different mean rainfall from the other days of the week. If, as I suspect, no such reason exists and one is merely looking for abnormalities in the data, then the correct procedure would be to use one of the standard tests for 'outliers'. (The basic difficulty is that a given set of data may show abnormal features in a large number of ways, and this fact has to be taken into account in testing any particular observed abnormality).
Given daily records of rainfall data over a substantial period, one could conduct a more comprehensive study by using methods of time series analysis to detect periodic patterns in the data, and to test for excessively large deviations from the mean level.
My suspicion is that, despite the sophistication of the statistical analyses used, there would be no 'significant' Thursday effect]
Yours sincerely,
M. B. PRIESTLEY
Department of Mathematics
University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments