Letter: Telephone taping
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Mr Varcoe-Cocks (Letters, 4 September) is correct that copyright may exist in a sound recording. However, that copyright is owned not by the person whose words are recorded, but by the person who made the recording. So copyright cannot be used by the former to try to prevent his or her words being published.
The speaker's words themselves will attract copyright only if they constitute a literary work. Although literary merit plays no part, it is necessary that the creation of the work involved the exercise of skill, judgement, effort or labour. A carefully drafted, though unscripted, speech might qualify, but not a casual telephone conversation.
Yours faithfully,
STEPHEN JONES
Chartered Patent Agents
E. N. Lewis & Taylor
Leicester
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments