Letter: Technology for hearing
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Kevin Carey's article on voice- activated computer technology spells out the advantages for people with dyslexia, but omits to mention one significant group which might also benefit.
Deaf people will undoubtedly reap the rewards of advances in computer technology. Real-time transcription systems such as Palantype, the system used by Lord Ashley in the House of Lords to follow debates, have been a great step forward.
The potential of voice-activated systems, transcribing the spoken word on to a screen, will have limitless applications for deaf and hard-of-hearing people across the spectrum of work and leisure.
Just as text-telephones, and soon video phones for sign-language users, have allowed communication barriers to come crashing down, so the development of CD-Rom and voice-activated systems will bring equality a step closer for Britain's deaf community.
Yours faithfully,
STUART ETHERINGTON
Chief Executive
Royal National Institute
for Deaf People
London, WC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments