LETTER:Teachers not solely to blame for poor lessons
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Nigel de Gruchy
Sir: It appears a trifle contradictory for David Aaronovitch ("Two heads who mark our schools", 6 February) to accuse me of blaming "anything and anybody" but teachers themselves for problems in schools, just after quoting my list of various causes, including "inappropriate teaching methods". What could be clearer than that?
He seems to have overlooked the very same press statement from which he quotes, in which I said:
It is wrong and simplistic to blame the 25 per cent failing exclusively on teachers.
clearly implying that teachers should shoulder their fair share of the blame.
Mr Aaronovitch then went on to say that Chris Woodhead had "no time for such talk". I heard Mr Woodhead say on BBC's Newsnight (5 February):
I agree with Nigel de Gruchy of the NAS/UWT that it is simplistic only to blame teachers.
Yours faithfully,
Nigel de Gruchy
General Secretary
NASUWT
London, WC2
6 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments