Letter: Teachers' lore
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WHY DOES Michael Mansfield compare a high-achieving, fully comprehensive education authority with a low-achieving selective authority? It would be more valid to compare Cheshire with Buckinghamshire, remembering that Bucks is also creamed off by the independent sector, and for a shire authority contains an above-average number of pupils with English as a second language. Bias in choice of statistics can prove anything. A far better rule is to leave successful authorities alone and concentrate the push for improvement on the rest.
Too many people forget that the very high achievement in Bucks is 70 per cent to the credit of our secondary modern schools. The media talk about the "grammar schools", as if the selective system works only for the most able: an insult to the dedicated staff in those upper schools such as the one where I was privileged to serve on the PTA for several years.
CAROL BLYTH
Wendover, Buckinghamshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments