Letter: Teacher anger over testing
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: One of the reasons for pursuing the introduction of tests for 14-year- olds was explained at a recent teacher conference by the Secretary of State for Education as being to identify that 30 per cent of pupils who have difficulty with English, so that they might receive expert support and remediation. This surprised me, for I thought that any competent teacher would have identified such children within a few hours of first teaching them, and both primary and secondary schools would have provided specialist support as a matter of course. Waiting until the pupils were 14 years old, as he appears to suggest, seems inappropriate.
Now either John Patten believes in what he is saying, or he does not. Either way, I am not sure that Education is currently in safe hands.
Your faithfully,
DAVID WARDILL
Fatfield, Tyne & Wear
8 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments