Letter: Tables turned
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Harold Stone
Sir: Any one block of the schools results tables falls clearly into three general categories: selective entry, non-selective comprehensive and specials for Special Educational Needs. No one would make comparison of results between the last two.
Your correspondent Caroline Beamish (letter, 23 November) might avoid her "scepticism and irritation" were she to separate the first two, and so separate considerations of educational achievement from issues of class and affluence.
Yours faithfully,
harold Stone
Wareham,
Dorset
23 November
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments