LETTER: System that makes it cheaper to pollute than to conserve
From Mr Martin Harper
Sir: Your leading article "Why oil firms should save our coasts" (23 February), expounding the virtues of the polluter-pays principle, is correct to point out that this is applicable in the Milford Haven disaster. You fail, however, to highlight the classic flaw of our market-based economy on which the principle is founded - it does not incorporate environmental values.
While oil companies may be asked to fork out millions of pounds for the clean-up operation, who will compensate those who have, hopefully temporarily but potentially terminally, lost the enjoyment of the beauty and wildlife of the region? Without a proper mechanism for financially quantifying quality of human life, the polluter will always escape full punishment.
Yours faithfully,
Martin Harper
London, SE24
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments