Letter: Swiss answer charges of non-cooperation

Mr Franz E. Muheim
Friday 06 May 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Following the article by Chris Blackhurst (28 April) about the Gordon Foxley affair, I would like to draw your attention to the following points.

Despite the fact that at the time the request for mutual assistance was presented, the UK was not a party to the European Convention on international mutual assistance and could therefore not grant reciprocity, the Swiss federal authorities agreed to consider the case and to transmit it to the competent cantonal judge in Geneva.

For international mutual assistance in criminal matters to be granted, the offence committed must also constitute a crime in Switzerland. That is the case here, since corruption of a civil servant is, as in Britain, a criminal offence covered and punished by the Swiss criminal code.

It must be stressed that the request by the British authorities was not rejected as such by the Swiss authorities, but the documents submitted were not complete and accurate enough for the cantonal judge to establish a double indictment and therefore to disclose the evidence requested.

Furthermore, the British authorities never asked for the freezing of the accounts or the restitution of the money.

Yours sincerely,

FRANZ MUHEIM

Ambassador of Switzerland

London, W1

2 May

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in