Letter: Subversion in the nursery
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Genevieve Fox writes that "even Mary Poppins... ended up upsetting the social order by marrying the children's widowed father." ("So farewell then, Mary Poppins", 9 January). Not so. The mother in the Banks household was very much alive - a devoted,
if slightly dotty, suffragette. And the whole point about Mary Poppins was that she knew her place. She was subversive in a very proper manner.
Perhaps Ms Fox has confused one Julie Andrews' role with another - that of Maria von Trapp in The Sound of Music. Maria ran away from a nunnery, stitched playsuits out of old curtains and answered back. She was the children's friend but even more friendly with their father, whom she went on to marry.
Many working mothers would give their best briefcases for a Mary Poppins. Unfortunately, she was a fictitious character who disappeared over the rooftops of London never to be seen again.
Yours faithfully, DEBORAH JACKSON Bath 9 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments