Letter: Subsidiarity in the EC will not preserve national sovereignty
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As a former senior legal adviser of the European Commission, I am dismayed by the way in which the principle of subsidiarity is often presented in the UK. Many of your commentators give the impression that under this principle substantial areas of government will be returned to unfettered national jurisdiction, which is not quite correct.
Whatever the scope of the domain of retained powers, the exercise of these powers is rarely fully sovereign. Abundant case law of the European Court of Justice has made it clear that whenever the exercise of retained powers is liable to affect the proper functioning of the internal market, member states are obliged to adopt such measures as interfere least with the unity of that market. Disregard of this treaty obligation renders the national measure incompatible with Community law, and therefore inapplicable if questioned before a national court.
In other words, the Maastricht treaty imposes a blanket restriction on such exercise of market- related retained powers as would unduly restrict the free movement of persons, goods, services or capital. Even after the adoption of the treaty, the interdiction to protect national markets will continue to intrude in national affairs throughout the Community. Quite often this may be to the UK's advantage.
As a result, subsidiarity presented as a right to reassert unfettered national sovereignty over considerable areas of government gives false hopes to the nationalists on the Community's biggest island, is not in the interest of the United Kingdom and is really a bit of a fraud.
Yours faithfully,
BASTIAAN van der ESCH
Brussels
1 July 1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments