Letter: Strike on Iraq

John V. Whitbeck London W1
Thursday 12 February 1998 01:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Before the US again kills a lot of Arabs, the world should recognise the principle to which these lives will be sacrificed.

It is clearly not the principle that all states must comply with all UN Security Council resolutions binding upon them, since the US clearly does not believe that Israel must comply with all (or, indeed, any) UN resolutions binding upon it, among them Resolution 242 (regarding Israeli- occupied Palestinian and Syrian territories) and Resolution 425 (regarding Israeli- occupied Lebanese territory).

It appears to be the principle that none of Israel's enemies should be permitted to develop or acquire those weapons of mass destruction and delivery systems which Israel already possesses. Enforcing the second principle maintains the imbalance of power which permits Israel to continue defying the first principle with impunity and to continue its occupation of Arab lands. It is this defiance and occupation which makes peace impossible and the use of any and all weapons in the region an ever-present threat.

The best way to achieve Middle East peace is not to make racially and religiously selective wars but to insist that all states comply with international law and with all UN Security Council resolutions binding upon them. A clear statement to this effect by the UN Security Council, concurred in by the United States, could produce Iraqi compliance in the short term and a broader Middle East peace, with some measure of justice, in the longer term. Without it, the region appears destined for another round of death and destruction.

JOHN V WHITBECK

London W1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in