Letter: Statistical odds that combined to cause the grand fiasco at Aintree

Mrs Pat Harris
Sunday 04 April 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I watched the making of history this afternoon when the Grand National race was declared void with a further decision not to rerun it at a later date during the year.

It appears unfair to take this decision when the cause of the problem rests entirely with the archaic starter system. Marcus Armytage, Travel Over's jockey, said there were very poor flag signals and that, in the case of the second false start, the only visible flag signal was given from behind the already racing horses.

Rod Fabricius, acting clerk of the course, supported this when he said that although a second signal further up the course had been given and from the right position, the flag itself had not been shown to the jockeys. Peter Scudamore, Captain Dibble's jockey, said he had seen this kind of mistake happen three times this season.

It seems there is no excuse for the starter system not to have been overhauled and upgraded before now. The owners, trainers, jockeys, horses and punters should not be punished because of a failure that had nothing whatsoever to do with them.

The only fair course of action seems to be to hold the Grand National later in the year when horses such as Travel Over, whose legs were injured when the tape wrapped around them, have had time to recover and regain their fitness, and to hope that such a recovery will happen in the case of all those horses which took part.

Perhaps, though, this is an indication that it is time to rethink the running of the Grand National altogether?

Yours sincerely,

PAT HARRIS

Twyford, Hampshire

3 April

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in