Letter: Standards of control in financial services
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Nicholas Goodison is reported as having criticised the standards of supervision exercised by Fimbra over its members (report, 24 November).
I am not sure on what basis Sir Nicholas has reached this conclusion. Fimbra has, in fact, adopted a robust line in regulating a previously uncontrolled sector of the financial services industry. Of the 12,000 firms that originally applied for authorisation under the Financial Services Act, 3,000 were unable to meet Fimbra's membership requirements. And in the past five years, a further 800 firms have had their authorisation removed. Fimbra has consistently met the monitoring requirements of the Securities and Investments Board and conducts more than 3,000 visits a year to examine the conduct and quality of advice of its members.
If Sir Nicholas would like to see our operations at first hand, I should be very pleased to welcome him.
Yours faithfully,
GORDON DOWNEY
London, E14
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments