Letter: Standard English versus the fad of linguists

Mr Anthony Clark
Monday 10 May 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: May I congratulate Tony Fairman ('English, but not as we know it', 7 May) on the quality of his standard English? Clearly, he was at school before the malign grip of the 'linguists' tightened round our system. Someone was able to reach him before the exponents of 'the extraordinary variety of English grammar' took over. In the style of his letter he is as much a flat-earther as any of us. Why did he write in correct, standard English? Because he wanted to say something to us all; he wanted to have you publish his letter.

If the fad of 'linguists' were stringently exercised in our schools, no one would grow up able to communicate beyond his own region, and the regional and ethnic minorities, for whom the academics assembled in Liverpool (Letters, 1 May) were rightly anxious, would become even more isolated, the class divide ever deeper.

Flat-earthers continue to believe that the term 'linguist' applies only to those who can handle a variety of other languages - Urdu, Italian, Greek or whatever - each in its standard form. If I want my daughter to learn French, I do not send her to a remote Breton village where they speak a patois that is little understood in France. And yet, even a remote Breton village would have its village school where the aim is to teach correct, standard French.

Yours faithfully,

ANTHONY CLARK

Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire

7 May

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in