Letter: Speculation on the Al Fayeds

Michael Cole
Sunday 16 November 1997 01:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I WAS wrong about Tim Hulse. He is not a smart alec, he is a clever dick. To take the letter I had written for publication and quote part of it in order to attack me and then change the subject to something unrelated, that is classic clever-dick journalism (People, 9 November). Clever dicks cannot take criticism though they like to give it out and their favourite weapon is innuendo, like Mr Hulse's sly suggestion (2 November) that the late Dodi Fayed took cocaine. As he cannot defend himself, let me confirm that Dodi Fayed was never connected with drugs. Can Mr Hulse say the same of himself?

Joan Smith says Mohamed Al Fayed "is currently contesting the decision of successive Conservative governments to deny him a British passport" ("Brown envelopes, battleaxes and very easy targets", 9 November). This is not so. Mr Fayed applied for naturalisation as a British subject only once, on 14 February 1994 and was refused by the Home Office on 23 February 1995, four months after his first allegations about the improper behaviour of four Tory ministers.

Ms Smith speculates as to the reasons for refusal. She does not know and nor does Mr Fayed. However, he hopes to find out when his case is heard by Britain's supreme court, the House of Lords, in February.

Michael Cole

Harrods, London SW1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in