Letter: Specious arguments in favour of broadcasting freedom
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your reports (21 January) made a major contribution to a sensible debate about the role of freedom in modern society.
The editors of the tabloid press, the Red Hot Dutch porn merchant and the television company keen to expose the gruesome details of mass murder all argue that their motive is not so much to make money, but to serve their 'popular' public.
Lord Gilmour, a staunch, traditional Tory, demolishes this self-serving case by arguing that if 'popular' demand were to regulate our approach to freedom, then we would also have to legalise drug pushers, who obviously would not survive if there were no 'popular' demand.
One can go further and show that if head-counting indicators of demand were to regulate our lives, we would certainly have the death penalty, and we would not have succeeded in imposing legislation to control various kinds of once 'popular' behaviour, such as not wearing seat-belts.
Lord Gilmour concludes that 'apparent demand is not a sign of virtue', so let these mercenary protagonists of a specious freedom to publish produce better arguments.
Yours sincerely,
FRANK HELLER
London, NW3
21 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments