Letter: Social Chapter: beggar-my-neighbour nationalism, wage differentials
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article on the European Community Social Chapter (3 February) referred to low-wage countries such as Spain attracting inward investment which otherwise would be blocked if the Social Chapter applied to Spain.
Why, then, is the Spanish government one of the strongest supporters of the Social Chapter in the European Council of Ministers? The reason is that Spain - and other EC members - consider that there is more to the construction of Europe than destroying all social rights so that multinational companies can squeeze a little more out of their workforce. Wage differentials exist and will continue to exist and the Social Chapter, rightly, says nothing about them.
It does suggest that European workers have common minimum rights - on maximum work time, on maternity leave, on health and safety provision, and on joint consultation with employers. Once those minimum rights have been met, it is up to countries, communities, employers and workers to decide on remuneration. But the British government is opposed even to the minimum common social rights that European citizens should enjoy in the workplace. The Hoover row and different wages in EC countries are irrelevant to Europe's main charge that Britain alone will not accept a level playing field on minimum social and consultation rights at work.
Yours
DENIS MACSHANE
International Metalworkers'
Federation
Geneva
5 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments