Letter: Sky bid does pose threat to pay-TV

Jeremy Thorp
Thursday 20 March 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Nigel Walmsley's letter (14 March), in reply to Polly Toynbee's perceptive article on digital television, obscures the important issues involved. The facts are as follows:

If the Sky/Carlton/Granada bid is awarded the licences to operate digital terrestrial television, it will smother any realistic possibility of effective competition in the pay-TV market. (Can anyone seriously imagine BDB, with Sky as a 33 per cent shareholder, bidding against BSkyB for premium pay- TV rights?).

It will reduce new opportunities in the advertising market; Granada and Carlton will do sweetheart deals to the benefit of their production companies, and new and independent programme producers will be locked out. Instead of creating greater diversity, the digital age will then concentrate power into the hands of an ever smaller number of players.

The British Digital Broadcasting partners have talked down the prospects for digital terrestrial for some months - and we now see why. They argue that the prospects are so marginal as to make it impossible for Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) to thrive against unbridled competition from digital satellite. This is gamesmanship at the expense of the public interest.

At DTN we take a different view, and believe that DTT presents a tremendous opportunity to create a competitive market - offering choice at a lower price to viewers; full scope for interactive services (such as home banking and Internet access); and great opportunities from independent producers. We believe this opportunity can best be realised by full-hearted competition.

JEREMY THORP

Digital Television Network

London SW1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in