Letter: Size of helicopter rescue service

Mr Jeremy Hanley,Mp
Sunday 10 April 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I should like to comment on your article about the findings of the House of Commons Transport Committee investigation into the provision of Search and Rescue services ('Passenger ferries 'at risk if helicopter rescue service is cut' ', 30 March).

While the Secretary of State for Transport will be answering the recommendations of the report in due course, when it has been studied in detail, I believe it is necessary to make a number of important points concerning the Search and Rescue (SAR) facilities made available by the Ministry of Defence.

The military SAR helicopter force drawn from the Royal Air Force and the Royal Navy is provided to meet the military requirement in peace and war, and its size is determined by this wartime requirement. In peacetime, the force is also able to make an invaluable contribution to the civil SAR task in the UK.

The criteria for this task were established by the Department of Transport's Helicopter Coverage Working Group in 1986. Basing (such as the choice between Chivenor and Brawdy) is primarily dependent upon military operational considerations; but the implications for civil SAR and, of course, cost are taken into account.

Yours faithfully,

JEREMY HANLEY

Minister of State

for the Armed Forces

Ministry of Defence

London, SW1

30 March

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in