Letter: Sixties icons are not ours
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: We fiftysomethings are "war babies", not "baby-boomers" - two quite distinct groups. Those born in the post-war baby boom would now be fortysomethings, like Ms Toynbee.
Many of my generation, I suspect, feel quite peeved at the way the baby- boomers came along and ruthlessly deconstructed the secure, socially cohesive, idealistic post-war world (1945-60) in which we grew up.
What they have given the rest of us is epitomised not just by the Sixties, but by the Thatcherite Eighties, too; both are two sides of the same coin. That coin, of course, is selfish libertarianism, the ethos of "blow everybody else, I'm going to have what I want".
The Sixties and Seventies applied this to sex and drugs, whilst the Eighties and Nineties expressed it in terms of money - but it is the same beast that Ms Toynbee's generation liberated from Pandora's box 30 years ago.
DAVID SMITH
Bletchley, Buckinghamshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments