Letter: Sites that warrant special protection
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The failure of English Nature's appeal to the House of Lords (Law Report, 24 July) shows that the principle underlying the protection of Sites of Special Scientific Interest is fundamentally flawed and that voluntary co-operation, where the owner's good nature is relied upon for site protection, is insufficient. SSSIs are in fact at most risk from the very people responsible for their protection because of wilful damage or simple neglect.
The case of Hill Heath SSSI has shown that the system offers no protection against the actions of non-owners carrying out operations on the land either. It is just one example of the 10 per cent of all SSSIs damaged each year. The Wildlife and Countryside Act, which aims to protect SSSIs, is now 10 years old, and in that time hundreds of SSSIs, the ecological jewels in our natural heritage, have been destroyed.
It is time for government to give the law some teeth and the whole SSSI network effective protection, for each SSSI lost leaves the British countryside poorer in wildlife and poorer for people. John Major's promises at the Rio Earth Summit to protect biodiversity, and Michael Howard's commitment to the European Habitats Directive will be shown to be without substance if no action is taken.
Yours faithfully,
T. S. CORDY
Chief Executive
Royal Society for Nature
Conservation
Lincoln
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments