Letter: Single-tier district councils will not succeed

Ms Lesley Ellis
Thursday 21 April 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Of course the district council chiefs would like to see the government review go through (Letters, 21 April). They would, wouldn't they? As a voter, I sincerely hope it does not.

The assumption that district councils are more accountable and responsive to local views is not necessarily a good one. County councils, being just that little more remote, can often take a more unbiased and rational view on local issues. In Hampshire, we have a superb county council which has done an excellent and enlightened job in protecting the county. Our local council, in contrast, seems more interested in the large town on our doorstep (Basingstoke). For example, despite local representations it insists on a pounds 1 parking fee (for more than two hours) in Alton, a policy which is slowly strangling our High Street by ensuring that shoppers at the (edge-of-town) superstore do not linger and explore this lovely town.

Even assuming that the local councils are responsive to local people, it cannot make sense to break up services which need a wide local co-ordination, such as social, educational and environmental services, into small units. All this will do is encourage a growth in bureaucrats trying desperately to 'co-ordinate' across council borders.

And dare I also argue, that as such a tiny percentage of the money spent by councils is now raised locally and so many local services are provided by contractors, the tier that should remain in any case should be the county, not the district councils?

Yours sincerely,

LESLEY ELLIS

Powntley Copse, Hampshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in