Letter: Single-tier district councils will not succeed

Mr Paul R. Sabin
Thursday 21 April 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The system advocated by the 164 chief executives of district councils who wrote to you (letter, 21 April) would not produce the utopian one council governing all. In fact, there would be three new tiers. Unitary councils themselves would have to band together in 'joint boards' to run the strategic services. Also, as any new unitaries would be far bigger than the existing districts, there would be a profusion of what would virtually be new area committees or councils.

It is also difficult to see how the halving of elected councillors would add up to better representation. On the officer front, each new unitary would no doubt want new heads for services, such as education and social services, thus duplicating the numbers of directors far beyond the recent countywide structure.

Finally, the cost of the upheaval. For the districts' favoured option, in Kent the payback period of the pounds 75m transitional costs for tax payers would stretch for 107 years. Nationally, the districts themselves have now admitted the bill is likely to be well over pounds 1bn.

The case for change has still not been made.

Yours sincerely,

PAUL SABIN

Chief Executive

Kent County Council

Maidstone, Kent

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in