Letter: Shock treatment: fears and facts

Ms Lucy Johnstone
Monday 14 December 1992 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Congratulations on your report about the alleged abuses at Broadmoor and in particular the use of ECT without muscle relaxant or anaesthetic. Scandalous as this was, it raises the question of an even greater abuse - the routine and accepted use of ECT on 130,000 people a year.

This is a treatment lacking a rationale for its use or convincing evidence for its effectiveness. Officially reserved for the most severely depressed, it is in fact given to a wide range of patients depending largely on the personal preference of the psychiatrist (some of whom use it 17 times as frequently as others).

It appears to 'work', if at all, by obliterating memories - a known after-effect of any serious injury to the head. This would explain the frequent complaints by patients about permanent memory loss - a complaint that is still being ignored and discounted by psychiatrists.

Most lay people wrongly assume that the use of ECT died out years ago. This is not true. Not only unmodified ECT, but ECT in any form, needs to be seen for the primitive and damaging procedure that it is.

Yours sincerely,

LUCY JOHNSTONE

Senior Lecturer in

Clinical Psychology

University of the West of England

Bristol

9 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in